Unidentified: Difference between revisions

From Sams Bugs
Created page with "= Unidentified == These animals have yet to be identified with the exact species. == Unidentified gallery == <gallery> File:Unidentified_01.jpg|A small cockatoo of some sorts </gallery> == Why is that important? == There are so many species that look very similar but would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look ou..."
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Unidentified ==
= Unidentified =


These animals have yet to be identified with the exact species.
These animals have yet to be identified with the exact species.
Line 11: Line 11:
== Why is that important? ==
== Why is that important? ==


There are so many species that look very similar but would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.
There are so many species that look very similar but one is very common and the other one would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.

Latest revision as of 22:46, 17 October 2025

Unidentified

These animals have yet to be identified with the exact species.

Unidentified gallery

Why is that important?

There are so many species that look very similar but one is very common and the other one would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.