Unidentified - Revision history

Admin at 22:21, 30 April 2026

2026-04-30T22:21:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 1 May 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:

	<gallery>		<gallery>
	File:Unidentified_01.jpg\|A small cockatoo of some sorts		File:Unidentified_01.jpg\|alt=A small cockatoo of some sorts
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Line 14:		Line 14:

	<gallery>		<gallery>
	File:Unidentified_02.jpg\|Rove beetle ~~1 picture 1~~		File:Unidentified_02.jpg\|alt=Rove beetle 01-2
	File:Unidentified_03.jpg\|Rove beetle 1 ~~picture 2~~		File:Unidentified_03.jpg\|alt=Rove beetle 01-1
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Admin at 22:17, 30 April 2026

2026-04-30T22:17:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 1 May 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:
	File:Unidentified_02.jpg\|Rove beetle 1 picture 1		File:Unidentified_02.jpg\|Rove beetle 1 picture 1
	File:Unidentified_03.jpg\|Rove beetle 1 picture 2		File:Unidentified_03.jpg\|Rove beetle 1 picture 2
			</gallery>

			=== Unidentified spiders ===

			<gallery>
			genus_araneus_06.jpg\|alt=green juvenile 01
			genus_araneus_05.jpg\|alt=juvenile 02-3
			genus_araneus_04.jpg\|alt=juvenile 02-2
			genus_araneus_03.jpg\|alt=juvenile 02-1
			genus_araneus_02.jpg\|alt=juvenile 01-2
			genus_araneus_01.jpg\|alt=juvenile 01-1
	</gallery>		</gallery>

	== Hah, I know that one! ==		== Hah, I know that one! ==

	You see an animal on here that you 100% recognize? [mailto:bugs@weirdmustard.de?subject=Unidentified Let me know!]		You see an animal on here that you 100% recognize? [mailto:bugs@weirdmustard.de?subject=Unidentified Let me know!] Please make sure you absolutely know that species. There are some that can only be identified on a genetical level, some spiders can only be ID-ed under a microscope. But sometimes everyone on iNaturalist missed something you spot in a picture that makes you sure.

	== Why is that important? ==		== Why is that important? ==

	There are so many species that look very similar but one is very common and the other one would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.		There are so many species that look very similar but one is very common and the other one would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.

Admin at 12:58, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T12:58:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:58, 17 November 2025
Line 20:		Line 20:
	== Hah, I know that one! ==		== Hah, I know that one! ==

	You see an animal on here that you 100% recognize? [mailto:~~weirdsenf~~@~~gmail~~.~~com~~?subject=Unidentified Let me know!]		You see an animal on here that you 100% recognize? [mailto:bugs@weirdmustard.de?subject=Unidentified Let me know!]

	== Why is that important? ==		== Why is that important? ==

	There are so many species that look very similar but one is very common and the other one would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.		There are so many species that look very similar but one is very common and the other one would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.

Admin: /* Unidentified bugs */

2025-11-17T11:25:07Z

Unidentified bugs

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:25, 17 November 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	<gallery>		<gallery>
	File:Unidentified_02.jpg\|Rove beetle 1		File:Unidentified_02.jpg\|Rove beetle 1 picture 1
	File:Unidentified_03.jpg\|Rove beetle 2		File:Unidentified_03.jpg\|Rove beetle 1 picture 2
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Admin: /* Unidentified bugs */

2025-11-17T11:23:26Z

Unidentified bugs

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 17 November 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	<gallery>		<gallery>
	File:Unidentified_02.jpg\|Rove beetle		File:Unidentified_02.jpg\|Rove beetle 1
	File:Unidentified_03.jpg\|Rove beetle		File:Unidentified_03.jpg\|Rove beetle 2
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Admin at 11:23, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T11:23:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 17 November 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	== Unidentified gallery ==		== Unidentified gallery ==

			=== Unidentified birds ===

	<gallery>		<gallery>
	File:Unidentified_01.jpg\|A small cockatoo of some sorts		File:Unidentified_01.jpg\|A small cockatoo of some sorts
			</gallery>

			=== Unidentified bugs ===

			<gallery>
			File:Unidentified_02.jpg\|Rove beetle
			File:Unidentified_03.jpg\|Rove beetle
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Admin at 11:17, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T11:17:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 17 November 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	File:Unidentified_01.jpg\|A small cockatoo of some sorts		File:Unidentified_01.jpg\|A small cockatoo of some sorts
	</gallery>		</gallery>

			== Hah, I know that one! ==

			You see an animal on here that you 100% recognize? [mailto:weirdsenf@gmail.com?subject=Unidentified Let me know!]

	== Why is that important? ==		== Why is that important? ==

	There are so many species that look very similar but one is very common and the other one would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.		There are so many species that look very similar but one is very common and the other one would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.

Admin: /* Why is that important? */

2025-10-17T20:46:45Z

Why is that important?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 17 October 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	== Why is that important? ==		== Why is that important? ==

	There are so many species that look very similar but would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.		There are so many species that look very similar but one is very common and the other one would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.

Admin: /* Unidentified = */

2025-10-17T18:01:15Z

Unidentified =

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 17 October 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= Unidentified ==		= Unidentified =

	These animals have yet to be identified with the exact species.		These animals have yet to be identified with the exact species.

Admin: Created page with "= Unidentified == These animals have yet to be identified with the exact species. == Unidentified gallery == File:Unidentified_01.jpg|A small cockatoo of some sorts == Why is that important? == There are so many species that look very similar but would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look ou..."

2025-10-17T17:58:04Z

Created page with "= Unidentified == These animals have yet to be identified with the exact species. == Unidentified gallery == <gallery> File:Unidentified_01.jpg|A small cockatoo of some sorts </gallery> == Why is that important? == There are so many species that look very similar but would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look ou..."

New page

= Unidentified ==

These animals have yet to be identified with the exact species.

== Unidentified gallery ==

<gallery>
File:Unidentified_01.jpg|A small cockatoo of some sorts
</gallery>

== Why is that important? ==

There are so many species that look very similar but would be a spectacular find. A wrong identification can actually become a problem for scientists accidentally adding a find to their data set. Even though most specialists know very well what to look out for in the species they are working with, poor quality in photos or tagging a wrong location can still make for a mistake. So I'd rather put these animals in the "unidentified" category than mess up anything.